We weren't exactly expecting to have so many people ask us to create a print version of Spring Fevers, so at long last we're happy to share it with you. Published through CreateSpace, Spring Fevers is available for $7.99.
For the cost-conscious, it is still available for free via Smashwords, where we'll soon have our 200th "sale," and for 99 cents for Kindle via Amazon. We hope to get that to Free also, but that requires more people telling Amazon they can find it for less elsewhere. How many more? I have no idea.
But for those who are on the fence about the $7.99 price for the printed version, the proceeds from all sales of Spring Fevers will be given to charity.
Thank you all for contributing to the success of Spring Fevers. I'm so pleased to have had the opportunity to work with such a great team of writers (and the designers are writers too), and there'll be further details about the next anthology, The Fall, which is scheduled to be published in October.
Monday, April 16, 2012
Sunday, April 01, 2012
Elephant's Bookshelf Press, LLC
A lot has been happening since the most recent post. We are in the final stages of the Print-on-Demand version of Spring Fevers, and in the next few days I expect the official creation of Elephant's Bookshelf Press, LLC, a small publishing firm. I am president and Chief Elephant Officer. For the initial anthology, I produced it as a small company, but this is also something I intend to do for a while now, so I decided it was best to be smart about it.
It won't change anything in the way the next anthology will be done. We have an excellent team in place to review and decide upon stories for inclusion, and the POD version of Spring Fevers even includes a short description of The Fall, which is scheduled for an October launch.
Things are hopping here, as much as an elephant can hop at least. (And no, this is not an April Fool's Joke.)
It won't change anything in the way the next anthology will be done. We have an excellent team in place to review and decide upon stories for inclusion, and the POD version of Spring Fevers even includes a short description of The Fall, which is scheduled for an October launch.
Things are hopping here, as much as an elephant can hop at least. (And no, this is not an April Fool's Joke.)
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
In Case You Missed It: Mindy McGinnis
On her blog, Lora Palmer interviewed Mindy McGinnis -- who wrote the lead story for Spring Fevers -- about short stories and her writing in general. I'll be on Lora's blog soon, myself. Stay tuned. Or better yet, check out Lora's Blog!
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
The Impromptu Blog Tour
As you might imagine, with the release of Spring Fevers, I've been running around crazily for several weeks. Between the salary-paying job, the freelance work, the demands of being a daddy to twin 3-year-olds, being one of the parents of a new publication offered its own challenges and rewards.
On the list of things that still need to be done, I have one I'm sort of going to address here: A blog tour. Usually, such things are done on other people's blogs, and I'm more than willing to do so. But I've not set anything up, so I figured, I have a few minutes here, why not do something on my own blog!
Luckily, I'm a journalist for a living, so I can make up questions on the fly if the interviewee becomes problematic.
How did the idea of doing Spring Fevers begin? It started as an idea bandied about among a few of the moderators of Agent Query Connect. Cat Woods and I liked it in particular, and I think I reached out to her to see how serious she was. From there, the idea blossomed. I knew that I wanted Robb Grindstaff to do the copy editing if he was available, and when I approached him, he liked the idea as long as he could submit a story too.
Is that kosher, having people who are publishing the anthology also contribute stories? I don't see why not. There's still a vetting process involved.
Well, it seems likely your stories would be published. Isn't there some sort of conflict there? Stories were rejected. I can speak for myself and say that at least one of the stories I'd intended to submit wasn't ready -- especially after seeing the quality that started coming in -- so I didn't even offer it. I won't embarass anyone, but there were stories by excellent writers that were turned down for a variety of reasons.
What was the percentage of stories that were accepted? I don't want to go into that.
It's a fair question. Yes, I know, but it's an awkward situation. This was the first anthology we were doing, and our goal was to impress people with the quality of the writing. The submissions came from people Cat and I personally asked to submit stories. We chose them because we believed they were of the caliber we wanted in this anthology and who were comfortable writing on the theme of relationships. We limited it to a maximum of three from each writer. Most writers submitted more than one. Not every writer who submitted saw a story published. Not every writer we approached offered a submission.
Was it more than half? Put it this way: sixteen stories were published. I will say that dozens were submitted.
So, at least twenty-four. Is this an interview or a math quiz?
Ok, back to where I intended to go. Thanks
How long did the process take? I'd have to go over my notes, but I think Cat and I asked people for submissions in the spring of 2011 -- maybe it was summer already -- and we gave them a deadline in the early fall. We knew we were looking at February 2012 to publish and just worked backwards from there.
Why February? In part because relationships seem like a nice spring topic. You know: New life, new love, new problems.
February is still winter. Technically. But I have flowers trying to bloom. Plus, Valentine's Day is in February. You can't swing a dead Christmas tree wreath without hitting something heart-shaped and red.
Problems? We're writers. Without problems, there's no tension. Tension moves stories.
You didn't want warm and fuzzy is what you're saying? No, that's not the point. We wanted excellent stories and characters who stuck in our heads and thoughts. One of the early and obvious definite yeses was Mindy McGinnis's First Kiss. It was and is creepy, but it's one of those tales that sticks with you. When we discussed the order of the stories, we all liked the idea of having that lead off. This is not your grandmother's relationship anthology.
More to come...
On the list of things that still need to be done, I have one I'm sort of going to address here: A blog tour. Usually, such things are done on other people's blogs, and I'm more than willing to do so. But I've not set anything up, so I figured, I have a few minutes here, why not do something on my own blog!
Luckily, I'm a journalist for a living, so I can make up questions on the fly if the interviewee becomes problematic.
How did the idea of doing Spring Fevers begin? It started as an idea bandied about among a few of the moderators of Agent Query Connect. Cat Woods and I liked it in particular, and I think I reached out to her to see how serious she was. From there, the idea blossomed. I knew that I wanted Robb Grindstaff to do the copy editing if he was available, and when I approached him, he liked the idea as long as he could submit a story too.
Is that kosher, having people who are publishing the anthology also contribute stories? I don't see why not. There's still a vetting process involved.
Well, it seems likely your stories would be published. Isn't there some sort of conflict there? Stories were rejected. I can speak for myself and say that at least one of the stories I'd intended to submit wasn't ready -- especially after seeing the quality that started coming in -- so I didn't even offer it. I won't embarass anyone, but there were stories by excellent writers that were turned down for a variety of reasons.
What was the percentage of stories that were accepted? I don't want to go into that.
It's a fair question. Yes, I know, but it's an awkward situation. This was the first anthology we were doing, and our goal was to impress people with the quality of the writing. The submissions came from people Cat and I personally asked to submit stories. We chose them because we believed they were of the caliber we wanted in this anthology and who were comfortable writing on the theme of relationships. We limited it to a maximum of three from each writer. Most writers submitted more than one. Not every writer who submitted saw a story published. Not every writer we approached offered a submission.
Was it more than half? Put it this way: sixteen stories were published. I will say that dozens were submitted.
So, at least twenty-four. Is this an interview or a math quiz?
Ok, back to where I intended to go. Thanks
How long did the process take? I'd have to go over my notes, but I think Cat and I asked people for submissions in the spring of 2011 -- maybe it was summer already -- and we gave them a deadline in the early fall. We knew we were looking at February 2012 to publish and just worked backwards from there.
Why February? In part because relationships seem like a nice spring topic. You know: New life, new love, new problems.
February is still winter. Technically. But I have flowers trying to bloom. Plus, Valentine's Day is in February. You can't swing a dead Christmas tree wreath without hitting something heart-shaped and red.
Problems? We're writers. Without problems, there's no tension. Tension moves stories.
You didn't want warm and fuzzy is what you're saying? No, that's not the point. We wanted excellent stories and characters who stuck in our heads and thoughts. One of the early and obvious definite yeses was Mindy McGinnis's First Kiss. It was and is creepy, but it's one of those tales that sticks with you. When we discussed the order of the stories, we all liked the idea of having that lead off. This is not your grandmother's relationship anthology.
More to come...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)